Skip to content

Fix bug where subcommand's positional args aren't captured#104

Merged
FollowTheProcess merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/subcommand-posarg
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Fix bug where subcommand's positional args aren't captured#104
FollowTheProcess merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/subcommand-posarg

Conversation

@FollowTheProcess
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Closes #103

@FollowTheProcess FollowTheProcess added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 3, 2024
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.48%. Comparing base (cdb7573) to head (952ddf6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #104   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.48%   92.48%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines        1011     1011           
=======================================
  Hits          935      935           
  Misses         44       44           
  Partials       32       32           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@FollowTheProcess FollowTheProcess merged commit 869bad3 into main Oct 3, 2024
@FollowTheProcess FollowTheProcess deleted the fix/subcommand-posarg branch October 3, 2024 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Named positional arguments in subcommands aren't captured

1 participant